This guide summarises ASCI's published Guidelines for Responsible Labelling of Synthetically Generated Content in Advertising and its 29 September 2026 press release. It is not legal advice. Confirm your own obligations against the guideline text, the full ASCI Code, or with counsel.
What Does ASCI Say About Virtual Influencers and AI Likeness in 2026?
ASCI's 2026 guideline on synthetically generated content puts two influencer-adjacent uses straight into the mandatory labelling category. Clause 2A covers "Using synthetically generated influencers and ambassadors." Clause 2B covers "Replicating a real person's likeness or voice even with their consent, for personalised messaging." Both sit under the heading "Mandatory Labelling Required", and ASCI states that "Labelling is mandatory in all such cases to help consumers understand the nature of the representation."
A third rule sits higher up, in the prohibited category. Clause 1D lists "Using unauthorised copyrighted work, deepfakes or a person's likeness without consent" as content that violates the ASCI Code "even if an AI label is used." Taken together, the three clauses give a clear ladder: an AI likeness used without consent is prohibited, one used with consent still needs a label, and a fully synthetic influencer needs a label too.
| Use in 2026 | ASCI category | ASCI's wording |
|---|---|---|
| A synthetic influencer or brand ambassador | Mandatory label | "Using synthetically generated influencers and ambassadors." |
| A real person's face or voice replicated, with consent, for personalised messages | Mandatory label | "Replicating a real person's likeness or voice even with their consent, for personalised messaging." |
| A real person's likeness used without consent, or a deepfake | Prohibited, even with a label | "Using unauthorised copyrighted work, deepfakes or a person's likeness without consent." |
| AI used to fabricate a testimonial or endorsement | Prohibited, even with a label | "Fabricating endorsements or testimonials". |
Why Does Consent Not Remove the Need to Label in 2026?
Because consent and disclosure protect different people. Consent protects the person whose face or voice is being replicated. Disclosure protects the consumer receiving the message, who would otherwise believe they were hearing directly from that person. ASCI's clause 2B is deliberately worded "even with their consent", which closes off the assumption that a signed release is the only obligation.
ASCI's own example makes the point concrete: "A brand sends personalised messages to consumers featuring a digitally replicated version of a real person's face or voice, with that person's consent, without disclosing that the content has been digitally generated or replicated." That is presented as the scenario the label exists to prevent. A celebrity voice greeting each customer by name is exactly what clause 2B describes, and under the 2026 guideline it needs a label.
Consent answers "may we use this person's likeness?" The label answers "does the consumer know this is generated?" ASCI requires both for replicated likeness in personalised messaging. Getting one does not satisfy the other.
How Does the Fabricated Testimonial Rule Apply to Influencer Work in 2026?
It is the line a label cannot cross. Clause 1A prohibits "Fabricating endorsements or testimonials i.e. using AI to create, alter or attribute an endorsement or testimonial in a manner that falsely represents that a real person has used, experienced, approved, recommended or endorsed a product or service when they have not." ASCI states this kind of content will violate the Code "even if an AI label is used."
For influencer marketing, that rules out several tempting shortcuts: generating a creator saying something they never said, altering a genuine review so it reads more favourably, or attributing an endorsement to a real person who did not give it. Each is prohibited regardless of disclosure. A synthetic influencer is a different case, because it is not presented as a real person who used the product, and ASCI treats it as a mandatory-label case rather than a prohibited one.
What Should Indian Brands Using Virtual Influencers Do in 2026?
Treat every synthetic persona and every replicated likeness as labelled by default, and build the label into the creative, not as an afterthought in a caption. The guideline lets brands choose the wording for these cases: clause 4 permits platform labels or the brand's own, "such as but not limited to 'Audio/Video created using AI' or 'Audio/Video enhanced using AI'", and alternatives "that accurately inform the consumer".
- Inventory your AI personas. Any synthetic influencer, mascot presented as a person, or AI ambassador in Indian advertising.
- Inventory replicated likeness. Any campaign using a real person's generated face or voice, including personalised video or voice messages.
- Check consent paperwork for every replicated likeness. Without consent, clause 1D makes it prohibited.
- Choose a label that accurately tells consumers the content is generated or replicated, and apply it consistently.
- Audit testimonials and reviews for any AI alteration or attribution. Clause 1A makes those prohibited even with a label.
- Brief creators and agencies on the difference between a labelled synthetic persona and a fabricated endorsement.
For the wider context of how influencer partnerships are structured in India, see our influencer marketing guide and our look at creator-led D2C brands in India. Content provenance standards such as those in our SynthID and C2PA guide are a separate, technical layer; ASCI's guideline is about what the consumer is told.
What Does the Guideline Not Settle for Influencer Marketing in 2026?
- Label placement and duration within a video or a post. ASCI says disclaimers "should follow the ASCI Code on disclaimer guidelines where applicable."
- Whether a recurring synthetic persona needs the label on every post or can rely on profile-level disclosure. The guideline does not say.
- Lightly AI-edited footage of a real creator. Routine edits such as colour correction and "voice modulations which do not purport to impersonate or mislead" are listed under no label required in clause 3A, but the line between enhancement and replication is a judgement call.
- Separate penalties. The guideline states that all SGC advertising is subject to the whole ASCI Code; it does not set out a distinct penalty regime.
When Do the ASCI AI Labelling Guidelines Take Effect in 2026?
The guideline text says: "These Guidelines shall come into effect on the expiration of 3 months from the date of their publication." The document is signed by the Chairman of ASCI's Board of Governors and dated 17 September 2026. ASCI's press release, datelined Mumbai, 29 September 2026, says ASCI "today released" the guidelines and that they "will come into effect three months from the date of publication."
ASCI does not itself state the calendar date on which the guidelines take effect. Two dates appear in its documents, and they do different jobs. The 17 September 2026 date is when the guideline was signed. The 29 September 2026 date is when ASCI says it released it. If 29 September is treated as the date of publication, three months runs to 29 December 2026. Plan to that date at the latest, and confirm the effective date with ASCI before relying on it in a contract or compliance calendar.
What Are the Common Mistakes With AI Influencers in 2026?
- Assuming consent is enough. Clause 2B requires a label "even with their consent".
- Presenting a synthetic persona as a real person. It is a mandatory-label case, and drifting into a false endorsement makes it prohibited.
- AI-polishing real reviews. Altering a testimonial so it misrepresents what a real person said is prohibited under clause 1A.
- Treating a deepfake as acceptable if labelled. Clause 1D puts deepfakes and unconsented likeness in the prohibited list, label or not.
- Hiding the label in a caption nobody reads. Follow the ASCI Code's disclaimer guidelines.
- Planning to the signing date. The three months run from publication; ASCI released the guideline on 29 September 2026.
Key Takeaways for 2026
- Synthetic influencers and AI ambassadors need a label under ASCI's 2026 guideline.
- Replicating a real person's face or voice for personalised messaging needs a label even with that person's consent.
- Deepfakes and likeness used without consent are prohibited, and a label does not fix them.
- AI-fabricated or AI-altered endorsements and testimonials are prohibited regardless of disclosure.
- Brands may choose accurate label wording for these cases, such as "Audio/Video created using AI".
- The guideline takes effect three months from publication: 29 December 2026 if ASCI's 29 September release date is that publication date. Confirm with ASCI.
Distk helps Indian brands plan influencer and creator programmes, including synthetic and AI-assisted work, with consent, disclosure and claims review handled before anything is published. If you are running AI personas in 2026, that is where we start.
Sources
- ASCI, Guidelines for Responsible Labelling of Synthetically Generated Content in Advertising, signed 17 September 2026. All quoted rules, definitions and examples come from this document.
- ASCI press release, Mumbai, 29 September 2026, for the release date and the effective-date wording.
- The Advertising Standards Council of India, ascionline.in.